Comparison of residue mapping strategies.
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-06 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_residue_mapping_strategies_/543282
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
We applied five residue mapping algorithms to three grids of predicted pockets (ConCavityL, ConCavityP, ConCavityS ). This table lists the PR-AUC for identifying ligand binding residues in the LigASite apo dataset for each combination. Our Blur algorithm achieves the best performance for each grid type.
我们将五种残基映射算法应用于三组预测口袋网格(ConCavityL、ConCavityP、ConCavityS)。本表格列出了在LigASite空态数据集(LigASite apo dataset)中,针对每种算法与网格的组合识别配体结合残基的PR-AUC(精确召回曲线下面积,Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve)值。我们的Blur算法在所有网格类型下均取得了最优性能。
创建时间:
2009-12-04



