KAP Questionnaire on MTS 2022 triage_raw data

Hypothesis: There is a strong correlation between triage knowledge and the execution of triage skills, as well as between triage knowledge and attitudes toward the revised MTS version.
Results: The median MTS scores for knowledge, attitudes, and practice were 69.6% (IQR = 60.9% - 73.9%), 40 (IQR = 34-42), and 70.0% (IQR = 60% - 80%), respectively. Significant differences in knowledge scores observed across socio-demographic variables, including age groups (p = 0.005), designation (p = 0.001), educational levels (p = 0.001), types of hospital (p = 0.008), awareness of MTS (p = 0.002), and participation in triage training (p = 0.018). Practice scores varied significantly with gender (p = 0.003), designation (p = 0.001), educational levels (p = 0.001), hospital type (p = 0.001), usage of MTS (p = 0.008), and MyTriage application (p = 0.02) . Post-Bonferroni correction analysis revealed significant knowledge, and practices score differences between nurses and EPs, as well as between AMO and EPs. Furthermore, respondents with doctoral degrees (91.3%, IQR = 91.3) and master's degrees (78.3%, IQR = 69.6 – 82.6) achieved higher median knowledge scores than those with lower qualifications.

研究假设：分诊知识与分诊技能的实施情况之间存在显著相关性，且分诊知识与对修订版预检分诊量表（MTS）的态度之间亦存在显著关联。
研究结果：知识、态度与实践维度的MTS中位数得分分别为69.6%（四分位距（Interquartile Range，IQR）=60.9%~73.9%）、40（四分位距IQR=34~42）与70.0%（四分位距IQR=60%~80%）。
在社会人口学变量层面，不同分组的知识得分存在显著差异，涉及年龄组（p=0.005）、职称（p=0.001）、学历层次（p=0.001）、医院类型（p=0.008）、对MTS的知晓情况（p=0.002）以及是否参与分诊培训（p=0.018）。
实践得分则在以下变量上呈现显著差异：性别（p=0.003）、职称（p=0.001）、学历层次（p=0.001）、医院类型（p=0.001）、MTS使用情况（p=0.008）以及MyTriage应用程序的使用情况（p=0.02）。
经邦费罗尼校正（Bonferroni correction）后的分析显示，护士与急诊医师（Emergency Physicians，EPs）、AMO与急诊医师之间的知识得分与实践得分均存在显著差异。此外，拥有博士学位（中位数得分91.3%，四分位距IQR=91.3）与硕士学位（中位数得分78.3%，四分位距IQR=69.6%~82.6%）的受访者，其知识得分中位数显著高于学历层次更低的受访者。