Nordic CONREASON collection of data on constitutional reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts

The Nordic CONREASON project applies a comprehensive and systematic analysis of constitutional reasoning in the supreme courts of the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). The data documents the argumentative practice of the seven Nordic supreme courts in their leading constitutional cases. The project used the methodology of the CONREASON-project (http://real.mtak.hu/36806/1/2015_09_jakab.pdf), which ran between 2011-2016, led by Andras Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich, adapting it to the Nordic context. The dataset contains data concerning 53 variables, including information on the general characteristics of the cases, types of arguments and key constitutional concepts that appear in the judgments.北欧宪法推理（CONREASON）项目针对北欧五国（丹麦、芬兰、冰岛、挪威、瑞典）的最高法院宪法推理展开全面系统的分析。本数据集记录了北欧七家最高法院在标志性宪法案件中的论证实践。该项目采用了2011至2016年间开展的CONREASON项目（http://real.mtak.hu/36806/1/2015_09_jakab.pdf）的研究方法，由Andras Jakab、Arthur Dyevre与Giulio Itzcovich牵头，并针对北欧语境进行了适配调整。本数据集涵盖53个变量的相关数据，包括案件基本特征、论证类型以及判决书中出现的核心宪法概念等信息。