Legitimering van inrichtingsopvoeding 1986-1987 : Interdoel

<p>Investigation into legitimation of pedagogic aims of residential educational institutes. Using the Delphi-method, a panel of experts, consisting of one staff-member per institute, representatives of referring institutes and external experts, were questioned about the aims of residential educational institutes and future policy regarding function and aims of this kind of educational service. Phase 0 consisted of making an inventory of the characteristic properties of the 14 institutes, the aims of residential youth aid and the policy issues at hand, to result in a common frame of reference for subsequent discussion and a final form for the questionnaire used in phase 1. Phase 1: Each specific expert-category responded to its questionnaire, evaluating and commenting specific aims in the framework of the five common characteristic aspects of the institutes: -national orientation, -closed character, -integrated help, -own educational facilities, -own recreational facilities. Phase 2: G: results of phase 1 were fed into the phase 2 questionnaire to refine discussion. Phase 3: G: results of previous phases resulted in several models for future policy to be evaluated by the expert panel.</p>寄宿教育机构教学目标的合法性论证研究 本研究采用德尔菲法（Delphi Method），组建由每家机构1名工作人员、对口机构代表及外部专家组成的专家小组，针对寄宿教育机构的教学目标以及此类教育服务的功能与目标相关的未来政策开展调研。 第0阶段：对14家寄宿教育机构的特征属性、寄宿式青少年帮扶目标及当前政策议题进行梳理盘点，以此为后续研讨建立统一参照框架，并为第1阶段的调查问卷确定最终形式。 第1阶段：各细分专家群体完成对应问卷作答，基于机构的五大通用特征维度对具体目标进行评估与评述： - 国家定位； - 封闭性特征； - 整合式帮扶； - 自有教学设施； - 自有休闲娱乐设施。 第2阶段：G：将第1阶段的研究结果纳入第2阶段调查问卷，以优化研讨内容。 第3阶段：G：整合前序两阶段的研究结果，形成多套未来政策方案供专家小组评估。