Tijdsbestedingsonderzoek m.b.v. een electronisch dagboek 1988

<p>Comparison of the effects of three research methods: paper and pencil interview (PAPI), computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) and computer assisted self interview (CASI). Time budget surveys with coded activities / work / domestic activities / child care / goods and services (shopping etc.) / personnel needs / education / organizations / entertainment / active and passive leisure / travel / comparison with respect to response / validity / costs / precision / nr. of mistakes / reliability. Background variables: basic characteristics/ place of birth/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ religion</p>本研究对三种调研方法的效果进行对比分析：纸笔访谈（Paper and Pencil Interview, PAPI）、计算机辅助电话访谈（Computer Assisted Telephone Interview, CATI）与计算机辅助自我访谈（Computer Assisted Self Interview, CASI）。本次采用的时间预算调查涵盖编码化活动分类，涉及的活动类别包括工作、家务活动、育儿、商品与服务（购物等）、个人需求、教育、各类组织、娱乐、主动与被动休闲、出行；对比维度包含应答率、有效性、成本、精度、错误数量与可靠性。背景变量包括基本特征、出生地、家庭特征、职业与就业状况、收入、资本资产、教育水平与宗教信仰。