登录后查看消息通知
搜索
常见问题
消息
登录
首页
/
数据集
/
Comparison of patient level studies evaluating CO@h.
Comparison of patient level studies evaluating CO@h.
收藏
Figshare
2024-11-15 更新
2026-04-28 收录
居家氧疗
治疗效果比较
数据链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_patient_level_studies_evaluating_CO_h_/27767742
数据链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
问题咨询
购买咨询
在线客服
NEW
资源简介:
Comparison of patient level studies evaluating CO@h.
应用场景:
创建时间:
2024-11-15
相关数据集
Sample size required to detect superior completion of 2R 20 or 2R 30 compared to 4R 10 with 80% power and α = 0.05.
临床试验样本量估计
治疗效果比较
Sample size required to detect superior completion of 2R20 or 2R30 compared to 4R10 with 80% power and α = 0.05.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
10
0
Second-line lapatinib vs. trastuzumab univariate analysis.
癌症靶向治疗
治疗效果比较
Second-line lapatinib vs. trastuzumab univariate analysis.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
3
0
Data_Sheet_1_Survival Significance of Patients With Low Prostate-Specific Antigen and High-Grade Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy.doc
前列腺癌生存分析
治疗效果比较
Objective: This study compared survival of prostate cancer patients with low prostate specific antigen level (PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml) and high-grades of Gleason score (GS) of 8–10 with different treatment opt
NIAID Data Ecosystem
3
0
Comparison of survival between patients who chose dialysis versus those who chose conservative care, patients being matched 1:1 by propensity scores.
治疗效果比较
慢性肾病药物治疗
Comparison of survival between patients who chose dialysis versus those who chose conservative care, patients being matched 1:1 by propensity scores.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
4
0
Clinical trials to compare two treatments
临床实验
治疗效果比较
Clinical trials to compare two treatments
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-04-10 更新
3
0
© 2023-2026 上海数据发展科技有限责任公司 版权所有
沪ICP备17003045号-15
沪公网安备31010402336585号
热门搜索
社区交流群
科研交流群
商业服务
数据资源
寻源服务
数据采集
标注服务
数据产品
代理销售
数据领域
凭证登记
数据产品
介绍推广